Board of GrievancesMunjaz10My actionsNotifications
PRJ-2026-035On track1IdeaAgile

Judicial Innovation Lab («Ebtikar»)

Add to watchlist

A sandbox to pilot judicial-tech solutions with universities and start-ups before rolling them out to the courts.

Project managerRahaf I. Al-NefaieSponsorEng. Majed S. Al-Rasheed

Budget (BAC)

SAR 5.2M

Actual cost

SAR 0

⁦0%⁩ of budget

Progress

⁦0%⁩

Planned ⁦0%⁩

Estimate at completion

SAR 5.2M

SPI · CPI

1.00Schedule performance index · 1.001.00Cost performance index · 1.00

Forecast finish

⁦2027-12-31⁩

On baseline

IdeaPhase ⁦1⁩ of ⁦11⁩

Next gate:Feasibility15 August 2026

  1. Idea · Current phaseIdea · Current phase
  2. Gate into «Feasibility»DecisionNot held yetDate15 August 2026Feasibility · Not startedFeasibility · Not started
  3. Gate into «Initiation»DecisionNot held yetInitiation · Not startedInitiation · Not started
  4. Gate into «Planning»DecisionNot held yetPlanning · Not startedPlanning · Not started
  5. Gate into «Approval»DecisionNot held yetApproval · Not startedApproval · Not started
  6. Gate into «Procurement»DecisionNot held yetProcurement · Not startedProcurement · Not started
  7. Gate into «Execution»DecisionNot held yetExecution · Not startedExecution · Not started
  8. Gate into «Monitoring & Control»DecisionNot held yetMonitoring & Control · Not startedMonitoring & Control · Not started
  9. Gate into «Handover»DecisionNot held yetHandover · Not startedHandover · Not started
  10. Gate into «Closure»DecisionNot held yetClosure · Not startedClosure · Not started
  11. Gate into «Benefits Realization»DecisionNot held yetBenefits Realization · Not startedBenefits Realization · Not started

Automated control: no initiation gate without an approved charter

Under the EPMO controls, a project cannot move into planning until its charter is approved and a sponsor is named.

Board of Grievances

Project charter

Judicial Innovation Lab («Ebtikar»)

DRAFTV0

1Project identity

Project name
Judicial Innovation Lab («Ebtikar»)
Project code
PRJ-2026-035
Sponsor
Eng. Majed S. Al-RasheedEng. Majed S. Al-RasheedVice President, Judicial AffairsP-011m.alrasheed@bog.gov.sa
Project manager
Rahaf I. Al-NefaieRahaf I. Al-NefaieHead, AI & Emerging Technologies OfficeP-027r.alnefaie@bog.gov.sa
Business owner
Faisal A. Al-ShehriFaisal A. Al-ShehriDirector, Digital Judicial Services Centre & Digital Justice Portfolio ManagerP-003f.alshehri@bog.gov.sa
Portfolio & programme
Digital Justice Portfolio
Type & methodology
Research · Agile
Current phase
1Idea

2Background & rationale

A sandbox to pilot judicial-tech solutions with universities and start-ups before rolling them out to the courts.

3Objectives

  1. 1Put emerging technology and AI to work
  2. 2Deliver integrated, beneficiary-centred digital judicial services
Serves the strategic objectives:SO-3.3Put emerging technology and AI to workSO-3.1Deliver integrated, beneficiary-centred digital judicial services

4Scope

In scope

  • A sandbox to pilot judicial-tech solutions with universities and start-ups before rolling them out to the courts.
  • Testable hypotheses
  • Prototypes

Out of scope

  • Operation and maintenance after the warranty period
  • Work outside the approved site or system boundary

5High-level requirements

  1. 1Testable hypotheses
  2. 2Prototypes
  3. 3Scale-up recommendations

6Deliverables

1Project management plan⁦2027-02-15⁩
2Main deliverable — stage 1⁦2027-07-21⁩
3Main deliverable — final stage⁦2027-11-14⁩
4Final report⁦2027-12-31⁩

7Key milestones

  1. Charter approved⁦2027-01-30⁩
  2. Contract signed⁦2027-03-26⁩
  3. 50% of works complete⁦2027-07-21⁩
  4. Provisional acceptance⁦2027-12-04⁩
  5. Closure⁦2027-12-31⁩

8Budget

  • Main contract⁦71.2%⁩3.7M
  • Supervision & consulting⁦13.5%⁩700K
  • Internal team⁦9.6%⁩500K
  • Contingency reserve (⁦5%⁩)⁦5.8%⁩300K
The owning sector’s approved budgetTotal5.2M

9Timeline

Start
2027-02-0124 Shaʻban 1448 AH
Baseline finish
2027-12-313 Shaʻban 1449 AH
Duration
⁦11⁩ months

10Key risks

  • No risks recorded yet.

11Constraints

  • Stay within the approved budget
  • Comply with the Government Tenders & Procurement Law

12Assumptions

  • Named internal staff available throughout
  • Approvals land within workflow SLAs

13Stakeholders

  • Project sponsorDecisions and funding
  • Business ownerAccepts deliverables, owns benefits
  • Projects Follow-up Office (EPMO)Governance and compliance

14Success criteria

  1. 1Delivered within the approved budget
  2. 2On the approved date ⁦±5%⁩
  3. 3Target benefits within ⁦12⁩ months

15Governance structure

  • Change Control BoardApproves scope, cost and schedule changesWeekly
  • EPMO CommitteeMethodology compliance, data quality, stage gatesFortnightly
  • Project management teamDay-to-day control, risks, issues, weekly statusWeekly
Version V0 · ⁦0⁩ of ⁦0⁩ signaturesInternal — not for circulation outside the Board
Esc

Quick actions

Go to

Projects

↑↓to move↵to openEscto close