Gate into «Submitted»DecisionGoDate19 January 2026DraftComplete
Gate into «Initial review»DecisionGoDate18 February 2026SubmittedComplete
Gate into «Feasibility»DecisionGoDate21 March 2026Initial reviewComplete
Gate into «Evaluation»DecisionGoDate20 April 2026FeasibilityComplete
Gate into «Committee review»DecisionGoDate21 May 2026EvaluationComplete
Gate into «Approved»DecisionGoDate20 June 2026Committee reviewComplete
Gate into «Prioritized»DecisionGoDate21 July 2026ApprovedComplete
Gate into «Converted to project»DecisionGoDate20 August 2026PrioritizedComplete
Converted to projectCurrent phaseCurrent phase
The request as filed
What the requester wrote on the intake form
Problem
Judges and their assistants spend hours reading the case file, summarising pleadings and searching the judicial codices for precedents; drafting a judgment in a recurring type of case takes two weeks.
Current state
70% of legal researchers’ time goes on summarising pleadings and searching by hand, and no tool suggests similar judgments.
Objective
An AI judicial assistant that summarises the case file, suggests precedents from the judicial codices and prepares drafts for judges and clerks — the decision stays with the judge.
Expected scope
Language models hosted inside the Board, an index of the judicial codices, integration with Mueen, and six use cases in the first release.
Expected benefits
Time & speed
A draft judgment in recurring cases in 2 days instead of 14
