RSK-0046Asir Administrative Court of Appeal Complex
Tender prices 18% above the engineer’s estimate
A risk's detail, response, contingency and residual risk.
Risk statement
From cause to event to impact — with the preventive controls before the event and the contingency after it
Cause
Higher construction costs and few qualified bidders in the Asir region
Preventive controls
- Negotiate with the lowest bidder under the Government Tenders and Procurement Law
- Split the project into two phases
2 / 2
Event
Tender prices 18% above the engineer’s estimate
Negotiation fails to bring the gap under 10%
Contingency
Re-tender with a reduced scope
Impact
A funding gap near SAR 93.6M, or a re-tender
Assessment
The level before and after the response
Inherent
Residual
Exposure
SAR 93.6M
Residual
47% off the score
Score trend
Last six months
- Score
- Target residual
Escalation path
Escalation engine: a high risk unreviewed for 10 days notifies the PM, 15 the programme manager, 20 the EPMO director
Last reviewed 5 days ago
Project manager
Current levelEng. Ibrahim A. Al-Ghamdi
Currently followed up here- 2
Programme manager
Eng. Ahmed Y. Asiri
Automatically at 15 days unreviewed · in 10 days - 3
EPMO director
Dr. Noura M. Al-Otaibi
Automatically at 20 days unreviewed · in 15 days - 4
Executive committee
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Qahtani
By the EPMO director’s decision
Mitigation plan
Each action with its owner and date — tick it off when complete
Negotiate with the lowest bidder under the Government Tenders and Procurement Law
Eng. Ibrahim A. Al-GhamdiEng. Ibrahim A. Al-GhamdiDirector, Engineering SupervisionP-036i.alghamdi@bog.gov.saIn progressIn 23 days2026-11-2010 Jumada II 1448 AHSplit the project into two phases
Eng. Ahmed Y. AsiriEng. Ahmed Y. AsiriDirector, Court ComplexesP-020a.asiri@bog.gov.saNot startedIn 33 days2026-11-3020 Jumada II 1448 AH
Trigger
Negotiation fails to bring the gap under 10%
Contingency
Re-tender with a reduced scope