Ground-improvement costs up after the geotechnical survey

16HighEscalated

A risk's detail, response, contingency and residual risk.

Risk statement

From cause to event to impact — with the preventive controls before the event and the contingency after it

Cause

The geotechnical survey found softer soil and higher groundwater than the design study assumed

Preventive controls

1 / 2

Event

Ground-improvement costs up after the geotechnical survey

16HighTrigger

The change request is not approved at the next CCB session

Contingency

Treat the ground in two stages, the courtroom block first

Impact

SAR 22.5M of extra ground improvement and a 75-day extension

SAR 22.5M

The level before and after the response

Inherent

16High

Residual

6Low

Exposure

SAR 22.5M

Residual

⁦63⁩% off the score

Score trend

Last six months

Escalation engine: a high risk unreviewed for 10 days notifies the PM, 15 the programme manager, 20 the EPMO director

Last reviewed 6 days ago

Project manager
Eng. Fahad T. Al-Sulami
Currently followed up here
Programme manager
Current level
Eng. Fahad T. Al-Sulami
Automatically at 15 days unreviewed · in 9 days
3
EPMO director
Dr. Noura M. Al-Otaibi
Automatically at 20 days unreviewed · in 14 days
4
Executive committee
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Qahtani
By the EPMO director’s decision

Each action with its owner and date — tick it off when complete

⁦1⁩ of ⁦2⁩ done

A change request for the extra ground improvement
Eng. Fahad T. Al-Sulami
Done⁦2026-10-06⁩
Value engineering of the foundation solution with the consultant
Eng. Fahad T. Al-Sulami
In progressIn 15 days

Trigger

The change request is not approved at the next CCB session

Contingency

Treat the ground in two stages, the courtroom block first