What if? — Facilities Rehabilitation & Sustainability Portfolio
The portfolio’s digital twin: try a budget cut, a change in people, cancelled projects and new initiatives, and read each decision’s impact before you take it (§5, §140).
Savings needed
SAR 0
Savings the engine found SAR 0
Expected value after the decision
SAR 1.1BSAR 1.1B
keeps 100.0%
Weighted risk
7272
High-risk: 1 → 1
People
6767FTE
Need 67 of 67 available
Move a control to see what the engine suggests.
The engine’s recommendation per project
Lowest merit first. Click a card to read the full reasoning.
Keep
Continues as plannedThe portfolio’s digital twin
Bubble colour is the engine’s recommendation; size is the project’s remaining cost.
- Keep
- Reduce scope
- Merge
- Defer
- Stop
| Category | Risk score | Strategic value | Cost remaining | Chart legend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dammam Administrative Courts Complex — Rehabilitation & Extension | 93.0 | 84.0 | SAR 157M | Keep |
| Solar Power for Court Buildings | 28.0 | 81.0 | SAR 39.9M | Keep |
| Energy Retrofit of Existing Court Buildings (ESCO) | 62.0 | 61.0 | SAR 30.4M | Keep |
| Al-Jouf Administrative Court Rehabilitation | 26.0 | 74.0 | SAR 26.4M | Keep |
| Abha Administrative Court Rehabilitation | 19.0 | 71.0 | SAR 2M | Keep |
From remaining spend to spend after the decision
- Total
- Increase
- Decrease
| Category | Change | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Remaining spend today | SAR 277.6M | SAR 277.6M |
| After the decision | SAR 277.6M | SAR 277.6M |
Saved scenarios, compared
Pick up to three scenarios to compare side by side on budget, benefits, risks and resources (§118).
A — 15% budget cut
Ready-made
B — 10% cut with 10% fewer people
Ready-made
Current scenario (not saved)
Scenario comparison
| AA — 15% budget cut | BB — 10% cut with 10% fewer people | |
|---|---|---|
| Budget cut | 15% | 10% |
| People change | 0% | −10% |
| Cancelled projects | — | — |
| Added initiatives | — | — |
| Savings found | 95.2M | 88.6M |
| Shortfall | 5.7M | Target met |
| Value after the decision | 938.6M85.3% | 948.4M86.2% |
| Risk after the decision | 70 | 69 |
| People needed | 48 / 67 | 50 / 60 |
| Recommendations | Keep 2Reduce scope 2Stop 1 | Keep 3Reduce scope 1Stop 1 |
Value kept vs savings
- Value kept %
- Savings of budget %