10My actionsNotifications

Scoring model

Version ⁦3⁩ · Approved

The criteria and weights the priority score is computed from.

Total weight

100 / 100

Total is 100 — ready to save

Value · 44%Urgency & compliance · 16%Impact · 20%Effort & risk · 20%

Criteria and weights

The eleven criteria of §8. Weights are percentages of the score; criteria that lower priority count inverted.

Value

  • Strategic alignmentRaises priority

    How far the request moves the Authority’s approved 2026–2030 objectives and their KPIs.

    %
  • Business valueRaises priority

    The operational and institutional value it adds: efficiency, quality or a new capability.

    %
  • Return on investmentRaises priority

    The financial return in the business case: net present value and payback period.

    %

Urgency & compliance

  • UrgencyRaises priority

    The cost of delay: what the Authority loses if work does not start this year.

    %
  • Regulatory requirementRaises priority

    Is it required by law, regulation or a regulator’s directive (NCA, SDAIA, the General Court of Audit)?

    %

Impact

  • Customer impactRaises priority

    Its direct effect on citizens, investors and visitors: time, effort and satisfaction.

    %
  • Sustainability impactRaises priority

    Its contribution to energy and water efficiency, lower emissions and a better environment.

    %
  • Digital transformation impactRaises priority

    Its contribution to digital services, processes and data use, against the national digital-transformation index.

    %

Effort & risk

  • RiskLowers priority

    Delivery, technical and contractual risk — the higher it is, the lower the priority.

    %
  • ComplexityLowers priority

    The number of parties, systems, integrations and process changes involved.

    %
  • Resource requirementLowers priority

    The team, budget and scarce skills it draws from the portfolio’s capacity.

    %
Esc

Quick actions

Go to

Projects

↑↓to move↵to openEscto close