What if? — Judicial Complexes & Smart Courts Portfolio
The portfolio’s digital twin: try a budget cut, a change in people, cancelled projects and new initiatives, and read each decision’s impact before you take it (§5, §140).
Savings needed
SAR 0
Savings the engine found SAR 0
Expected value after the decision
SAR 4.2BSAR 4.2B
keeps 100.0%
Weighted risk
6969
High-risk: 2 → 2
People
186186FTE
Need 186 of 186 available
Move a control to see what the engine suggests.
The engine’s recommendation per project
Lowest merit first. Click a card to read the full reasoning.
Keep
Continues as plannedThe portfolio’s digital twin
Bubble colour is the engine’s recommendation; size is the project’s remaining cost.
- Keep
- Reduce scope
- Merge
- Defer
- Stop
| Category | Risk score | Strategic value | Cost remaining | Chart legend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board of Grievances Headquarters, Riyadh | 84.0 | 93.0 | SAR 735.9M | Keep |
| Asir Administrative Court of Appeal Complex | 58.0 | 89.0 | SAR 509.6M | Keep |
| Buraydah Administrative Courts Complex | 80.0 | 88.0 | SAR 203.4M | Keep |
| Arar Administrative Courts Complex | 61.0 | 83.0 | SAR 166.1M | Keep |
| Unified Judicial Operations Centre | 44.0 | 78.0 | SAR 110M | Keep |
| Secure Judicial Network | 54.0 | 69.0 | SAR 61.2M | Keep |
| Remote Video Hearings Roll-out — Makkah Region | 35.0 | 71.0 | SAR 45.1M | Keep |
| Smart Security & Access for Court Buildings | 55.0 | 64.0 | SAR 16.5M | Keep |
From remaining spend to spend after the decision
- Total
- Increase
- Decrease
| Category | Change | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Remaining spend today | SAR 1.9B | SAR 1.9B |
| After the decision | SAR 1.9B | SAR 1.9B |
Saved scenarios, compared
Pick up to three scenarios to compare side by side on budget, benefits, risks and resources (§118).
A — 15% budget cut
Ready-made
B — 10% cut with 10% fewer people
Ready-made
Current scenario (not saved)
Scenario comparison
| AA — 15% budget cut | BB — 10% cut with 10% fewer people | |
|---|---|---|
| Budget cut | 15% | 10% |
| People change | 0% | −10% |
| Cancelled projects | — | — |
| Added initiatives | — | — |
| Savings found | 431.5M | 289M |
| Shortfall | Target met | Target met |
| Value after the decision | 3.8B89.7% | 4B95.5% |
| Risk after the decision | 69 | 71 |
| People needed | 139 / 186 | 143 / 167 |
| Recommendations | Keep 2Reduce scope 3Merge 1Defer 2 | Keep 2Reduce scope 3Merge 1Defer 2 |
Value kept vs savings
- Value kept %
- Savings of budget %