Board of GrievancesMunjaz10My actionsNotifications

What if? — Judicial Complexes & Smart Courts Portfolio

The portfolio’s digital twin: try a budget cut, a change in people, cancelled projects and new initiatives, and read each decision’s impact before you take it (§5, §140).

Savings needed

SAR 0

Savings the engine found SAR 0

Expected value after the decision

SAR 4.2BSAR 4.2B

keeps ⁦100.0%⁩

Weighted risk

6969

High-risk: ⁦2⁩ → ⁦2⁩

People

186186FTE

Need ⁦186⁩ of ⁦186⁩ available

Move a control to see what the engine suggests.

The engine’s recommendation per project

Lowest merit first. Click a card to read the full reasoning.

Keep8Reduce scope0Merge0Defer0Stop0

Keep

Continues as planned

The portfolio’s digital twin

Bubble colour is the engine’s recommendation; size is the project’s remaining cost.

The portfolio’s digital twin
  • Keep
  • Reduce scope
  • Merge
  • Defer
  • Stop
Cost remaining · SAR 735.9M
The portfolio’s digital twin
CategoryRisk scoreStrategic valueCost remainingChart legend
Board of Grievances Headquarters, Riyadh84.093.0SAR 735.9MKeep
Asir Administrative Court of Appeal Complex58.089.0SAR 509.6MKeep
Buraydah Administrative Courts Complex80.088.0SAR 203.4MKeep
Arar Administrative Courts Complex61.083.0SAR 166.1MKeep
Unified Judicial Operations Centre44.078.0SAR 110MKeep
Secure Judicial Network54.069.0SAR 61.2MKeep
Remote Video Hearings Roll-out — Makkah Region35.071.0SAR 45.1MKeep
Smart Security & Access for Court Buildings55.064.0SAR 16.5MKeep

From remaining spend to spend after the decision

From remaining spend to spend after the decision
  • Total
  • Increase
  • Decrease
From remaining spend to spend after the decision
CategoryChangeRunning total
Remaining spend todaySAR 1.9BSAR 1.9B
After the decisionSAR 1.9BSAR 1.9B

Saved scenarios, compared

Pick up to three scenarios to compare side by side on budget, benefits, risks and resources (§118).

  • A — 15% budget cut

    Ready-made

  • B — 10% cut with 10% fewer people

    Ready-made

  • Current scenario (not saved)

Scenario comparison

AA — 15% budget cutBB — 10% cut with 10% fewer people
Budget cut⁦15%⁩⁦10%⁩
People change0%−10%
Cancelled projects——
Added initiatives——
Savings found431.5M289M
ShortfallTarget metTarget met
Value after the decision3.8B⁦89.7%⁩4B⁦95.5%⁩
Risk after the decision6971
People needed139 / 186143 / 167
RecommendationsKeep 2Reduce scope 3Merge 1Defer 2Keep 2Reduce scope 3Merge 1Defer 2

Value kept vs savings

  • Value kept %
  • Savings of budget %
Esc

Quick actions

Go to

Projects

↑↓to move↵to openEscto close